Weekly Round-up | Silver, Sword, Stone, and Getting Organized!

July 12 – July 18
Every week I create a round-up of my favorite reads and listens over the last 7 days. Some links go directly to articles and books, others go to my post with notes.

Getting Organized

“The system that meets your needs today will have to change tomorrow. That is not failure. That is life.”

One of the major projects on my list is organizing the paper archives of Kirkland Arts Center. This is no small task–with nearly 50 boxes of paper stuffs sitting around my office and the building at large. In this process I decided I needed to hire a consultant to get our grants in order. During one of my interviews, the Paper Solution by Lisa Woodruff was mentioned, and it was a really well timed read–not just for helping my work at Kirkland but also organizing my household now that I am combining my life with my now-husband more fully. The biggest take away in all of what Woodruff writes is grace — realizing that perfection is not achievable, that it is a perpetual process.

Silver, Sword, and Stone of Latin America

My latest history kick is focused on the histories of Latin and south America–a highly neglected area of study that I’ve felt unsure how to access. After reading 1491, I jumped to When Montezuma Met Cortez. Both books, while excellent, where very dense and slightly difficult reads for someone with a limited orientation to that region and history of our world.

I just picked up Silver, Sword, and Stone by Marie Arana, which already is reading much more smoothly, and seems to encompasses history that spans from the 1400s-today.

Notes | 1491 by Chris Mann

Territorial v Hegemonic Empires

“Territorial empires directly occupy territories with their armies, throw out the old rulers, and annex the land. In hegemonic empires, the internal affairs of conquered areas remain in the hands of their original rulers, who become vassals. Territorial empires are tightly controlled but costly to maintain; hegemonic empires are inexpensive to maintain because the original local rulers incur the costs of administration, but the loose tie between master and vassal encourage rebellion. ” p 78

On the Impact of Small Pox

“The empire’s population may well have been halved during this epidemic.”

“The human and social costs are beyond measure. Such overwhelming traumas tear at the bonds that hold cultures together.”

“The Inka… were not defeated by steel and horses but by disease and factionalism.”

“When the Europeans actually arrived, the battered, fragmented cultures could not unite to resist the incursion. Instead one party, believing that it was about to lose the struggle for dominance, allied with the invaders to improve its position. The alliance was often successful, in that the party gained the desired advantage. But its success was usually temporary and the culture as a whole always lost.”

“The first whites to explore many parts of the Americas therefore would have encountered places that were already depopulated.” … “…calculated that in the first 130 years of contact about 95 percent of the people in the Americas died.” … “the epidemics killed about 1 out of every 5 people on earth.” 105

On the Size of the Americas

“When Columbus landed, Cook and Borah concluded, the central Mexican plateau alone had a population of 25.2 million. By contrast, Spain and Portugal together had fewer than 10 million inhabitants. Central Mexico…was the most densely populated place on earth, with more than twice as many people per square mile than China or India.” 104

“Dobyns argued that the Indian population in 1491 was between 90 and 112 million; Another way of saying this is that when Columbus sailed more people lived in the Americas than in Europe.” 104

Indian Activists reject low-number estimates: “The smaller the number of Indians, the easier it is to regard the continent as empty and hence up for grabs. ‘Its perfectly acceptable to move into unoccupied land,’ Stiffarm told me. ‘And land with only a few savages is the next best thing.'” 106

On the Inka Royal Deceased

“Because the royal mummies were not considered dead, their successors obviously could not inherit their wealth. Each Inka’s panaqa retained all of his possessions forever, including his palaces, residences, and shrines; all of his remaining clothes, eating utensils, fingernail pairings, and hair clippings; and the tribute from the land he had conquered. In consequence, the greater part of the people, treasure, expenses, and vices, were under the control of the dead. The mummies spoke through female mediums who represented the panaqa’s surviving courtiers or their descendants.”

On Disease

“We had no belief that one Man could give a disease to another… any more than a wounded Man could give his wound to another.” – Blackfoot raider. p122

“Rare is the human spirit that remains buoyant in a holocaust.” p122

On Religious Leadership

From a conversation between the Franciscan Missionaries and the Mexica clerics: “We have a function: providing comfort and meaning to the common folk. To disavow their faith, the Mexica say, would tear apart their lives.”

On Government Formats

[In the Americas] government was an invention. Everywhere else it was inherited or borrowed. People were born into societies with governments or saw their neighbor’ governments and copied the idea. Here, people came up with it thsemlves. p 206

“All states can be parceled into four types: Pluralist, in which the state is seen by its people as having moral legitimacy; populist, in which government is viewed as an expression of the people’s will; ‘Great Beast’ in which the rulers’ power depends on using force to keep the populace cowed; and ‘Great Fraud’, in which the elite uses smoke and mirrors to convince the people of its inherent authority. Every state is a mix of all of these elements.” p 257

The Inka would select the most qualified son. Operated as a hegemony. p88

The Mexica: “A council of clan elders chose the overall ruler. Or, rather, the overall rulers–The Mexica divided authority between a tlatoani (literally: Speaker), a diplomatic and military commander who controlled relations with other groups, and a cihuacoatl (literally: Female Serpant) who supervised internal affairs.” p130

The Triple Alliance: A patchwork of satrapies, not a unified state.

The Five Nations: No woman could be a war chief, no man could lead a clan. The female-led clan councils set the agenda of the League… Women, who held title to all the land and its produce, could vote down decisions by the male leaders of the League and demand that an issue be reconsidered. p 373

On Death

Many if not most tlamatinime saw existance as Nabokov feared: “a brief crack of light between two eternities of darkness.”

From the Nahuatl canon:

“Not forever on earth; on a little while here.
Be it jade, it shatters.
Be it gold, it breaks.
Be it a quetzal feather, it tears apart.
Not forever on earth; on a little white here.”
[p134]

Verse by Nezahualcoyotl:

“Like a painting, we will be erased.
Like a flower, we will dry up here on earth.
Like plumed vestments of the precious bird,
That precious bird with the agile neck,
We will come to an end.”
[p134]

Because we human beings are transitory, our lives as ephemeral as dreams, the tlamatinime suggested that immutable truth is by its nature beyond human experience. … Time and time again, the wrestled with “How can beings of hte moment grasp the perduring? It would be like asking a stone to understand mortality.”

On Art & Truth

“Ayocuan was suggesting that there is a time when humankind can touch the enduring truths that underlie our fleeting lives. That time is at the moment of artistic creation. “From whence come the flowers that enrapture man? The song that intoxicate, the lovely songs? Only from HIs home do they come, from the innermost part of heaven. “

Through art alone can human beings approach the real.

p137

On Combat

“The Mexica did not view the goal of warfare as wiping out enemies to the last man; they did not hunt down the last spaniards.” p 141

On Guilt & Responsibility

“The invaders caused huge numbers of deaths, and knew that they had done it. “Those who carried the microbes across the Atlantic were responsible, but not guilty,” Salomon concluded. Guilt is not readily passed down generations, but responsibility can be. A first step toward satisfying that responsibility for Europeans and their descendants in North and South America would be to treat indigenous people today with respect–something that, alas, cannot yet be taken for granted. Recognizing and obeying past treaties wouldn’t be a bad idea either.”

On Farming and the Milpa

“A milpa is a field, usually but not always recently cleared, in which farmers plant a dozen crops at once, including maize, avocados, multiple varieties of squash adn bean, melon, tomatoes, chilis, sweet potato, jicama, amarnth, and mucana.”

“Because agricultural fields are less diverse than natural ecosystems, they cannot perform all their functions. As a result, farm soils can rapidly become exhausted. … The milpa by contrast has a long record of success.” p 221

On The Future

“Native Amreicans ran the continent as they saw fit. Modern nationas must do the same. If they want to return as much of hte landscape as possible to its state in 1491, they will have ot create the worlds largest gardens.

Gardens are fashioned for many purposes with many different tools, but all are collaborations with natural forces. Rarely do their makers claim to be restoring or rebuilding anything from the past; and they are never in full control of the results. Instead, using the best tools they have and all the knowledge that they can gather, they work to create future environments.

If there is a lesson it is that to think like the original inhabitants of these lands we should not set our sights on rebuilding an environment from the past but concentrate on shaping a world to live in for the future.” – p 266

Other Random Quotes

“Ambition succeeds best when disguised by virtue.” p131

His word, his breath; Truth. p 136

Writing begins with counting. When a culture grows big enough, it aquires an elite, which needs to monitor the things it considers important: money, stored goods, births and deaths, the progression of time.” p 238

“The sense that anyone is as good as anyone else fuels entrepreneurial self-reliance, but also can lead to what outsiders view as political know-nothingism.” p 370

Weekly Round-up | Performative Activism and The Truth About the History of the Americas

Every week I create a round-up of my favorite reads and listens over the last 7 days. Some links go directly to articles and books, others go to my post with notes.

This week was a particularly light reading week, with most of my time spent on making progress through Hood Feminism and 1491; Both which are still not finished. I usually get through books pretty fast but Kirkland Arts was bringing in a new Executive Director this week, which took up most of my available free time and energy.

Tuesday: Executive Onboarding

In anticipation of the new ED onboarding, I’ve been going through my old executive materials as well as looking up new resources for dealing with virtual onboarding. While nothing was stand out, I did like the break down into 5 categories by Nick Chambers.

Thursday: Poetry

Brainpickings is one of my favorite websites and this week one of the featured authors was the poet Lisel Mueller.

Friday: Performative Activism & Settler Priviledge

What is Performative Activism?
“We know performative activism occurs when those with power wish to give the appearance of supporting members of Black, Indigenous and racialized communities — but aren’t willing to transfer power and transform organizational cultures, policies, practices and behaviours.”

Why should we care about performative activisim?
Aside from the fact that the nonprofit sector is rooted in White Saviorism, “Performative activism leads to new and insidious forms of oppression for Black, Indigenous and racialized people. Performative institutions distract from the real issues at stake and also create additional labour for the Black, Indigenous and racialized people who end up collaborating with them. 

Weekend Reads: 1491

Despite going to relatively well resourced schools in the 1990s and early 2000s, I didn’t receive a comprehensive or accurate education in the history of the pre-Columbus Americas. I remember doing study projects on spanish conquistadors, with the focus on their ‘discoveries’ and achievements, rather than on the genocide of the existing indigenous populations. I was taught hat the Americas were for the most part uninhabited and underdeveloped by the time the Europeans landed, and that there were no major civilizations aside from the ‘barbaric’ Maya or Aztec.

1491 hammers home the astounding and offensive the gap between my childhood education and reality. Before Columbus, there may well have been more people living in the Americas than in Europe, with some estimates putting it as high as 112 million, many of them in urban complexes bigger and more sophisticated than London or Paris. These civilizations undertook major engineering and public work projects, build monuments to rival the Egyptians, and modified their landscapes to produce an abundance of food. Furthermore, the largest human dieback in history occurred when the Europeans arrived–carrying with them Smallpox, with up to 90% of the population dying from the disease.

I first read 1491 in college, but was so exhausted due to my academic load, that the impact of what I was reading was minor. Living now in the Pacific Northwest, and travelling more extensively across the western states of the US, this book has re-opened my eyes to the past brilliance and devastation of our indigenous populations.

Still in Progress…

I’ve been slowly making progress on these below, and will log them with my notes once I finish (Hopefully this week?)

On Emancipationist vs Reconciliationist Post-Civil War Perspectives | Eric Forner

Two understandings of how the Civil War should be remembered collided in post-bellum America. One was the “emancipationist” vision hinted at by Lincoln in the Gettysburg Address when he spoke of the war as bringing a rebirth of the republic in the name of freedom and equality. The other was a “reconciliationist” memory that emphasized what the two sides shared in common, particularly the valor of individual soldiers, and suppressed thoughts of the war’s causes and the unfinished legacy of emancipation. By the end of the century, in a segregated society where blacks’ subordination was taken for granted North and South, “the forces of reconciliation” had “overwhelmed the emancipationist vision.”